Panthers Only On Safari 1.2

Sigh! Apple, Apple, Apple! What are you doing!

Safari 1.2 has been released, but if you’re not running Panther then you can’t. Yes, yes I know same goes for Safari 1.1, and not a peep was made by me. I don’t know, I was too busy to notice, and was kinda hoping that Apple would rectify this shortly. Then I thought that maybe the 1.1 release were just minor changes to get it to run on Panther, I don’t know, like some porting thing or something. I don’t know, I’m not a geek, I’m a designer. Maybe this is the case for 1.2 also, maybe, maybe not…

Is Apple intentionally doing this to force users to upgrade their OS? Will users keep having to upgrade almost every time there’s a new Safari release, like a certain Microsoft company you might know about will be doing with their browser from now on? (security patches are of course the exception).

Is this not good or am I just whinging? Maybe some answers will turn up here someday.

Share this Story
Load More Related Articles
  • Art

    Sydney Gallery School To Lose Gallery

    I’m a part-time fine arts student at Meadowbank TAFE, also known as the Sydney Gallery School. I’ve just found out that ...
  • Technology

    Adobe Not Releasing Universal Binaries Of Current Software

    Adobe have posted this question and answer PDF regarding Adobe products running on the new Intel-Based Macs. Looks like the Photoshop TV guys were right, a Universal Binary will not be available for CS2, Adobe will instead focus on making CS3 compatible with both Intel-Based Macs and the current Macs. CS3 could be available in the next 18 - 24 months if you look at Adobe's rack record for major releases.
  • Art Design Technology

    The Dreadful Embarrassment, Now In Purple!

    Like most creatives who prefer working on Apples, I've been hanging out for some sort of concrete evidnece that the Adobe CS2 suite will run well/much better on the new Intel-based Macs under the Rosetta emulator, or that Adobe will release a Universal Binary update. Well I need a new mac within the next week, and decided to just go ahead and place an order for a 17-inch PowerBook any ways. I've also managed to find a two-tone purple laptop bag over at the Crumpler site named, The Dreadful Embarrassment.
  • Technology

    The First Duel Core Apples

    Bad punning aside, Apple have announced the first intel core duo macs: the MacBook Pro and iMac.
  • Design

    Bejing 2008 Olympic Mascots

    The Official Mascots of the Beijing 2008 Olympic Games are freakin’ gorgeous! They so kick ass over Syd, Olly and Dickhead, ...
  • Entertainment Technology

    Black iPods and iTMS Oz

    This has been a pretty big couple o’ weeks for Apple. New iMacs, new powerbooks, new G5’s and pro photography app ...
Load More By lucie
Load More In Technology

5 Comments


  1. Jeanne D'Arc

    5 February 2004 at 5.38 am

    I guess Apple feels that anyone too cheap to upgrade to 10.3 when it represents such a HUGE performance/feature leap over 10.2, just isn’t concious enough to care about a minor Safari point upgrade.

    Reply

  2. Doug Petrosky

    5 February 2004 at 6.12 am

    I would suspect that the reason for this is has to do with changes in the HTML rendering API’s that exist in Panther and not Jarguar.
    The real message here is if Panther is not good enough as it sits, don’t buy it with the hope that it will get better over time for free (although it has). Once the number of updates and features are enough that it makes sense to drop some more cash, go ahead and do it. Until then, continue to use what you have.
    By doing this you may skip over a whole OS release. The question is will you get $100+ of productivity out of Panther over the next year to year and a half (14 months for Jaguar)? If not sit this one out, and look for ward to 10.4 at the end of this year or the start of next year.

    Reply

  3. Lucie

    5 February 2004 at 8.59 am

    Right now forking out for Panther is just not on the agenda for me as I’m actually going purchase/rent a brand spanking new mac to replace ye olde indigo clamshell iBook and beige G3 soonish. Yes, I still have a mac before technicolour.
    BUT at work we are now looking at testing and supporting certain sites in Safari. The question now is do we test our sites to function in Safari 1.0 – 1.2, or just whatever the latest OS and browser is and bugger all the other OSX.whatever users?
    One thing I’m going to have to find out is if you can have Safari 1.1 and 1.2 both installed on Panther.

    Reply

  4. Roger Harris

    5 February 2004 at 3.33 pm

    Safari can easily be replaced by any of the great mozilla browsers. I just tried the new Safari and then went back to Firebird. If Safari was better than other free browsers I could see 10.2 folks getting a bit twisted; Safari is a not better browser.

    Reply

  5. lucie

    5 February 2004 at 5.01 pm

    No doubt that there are better browsers than Safari, and that the Mozilla family is lovely. Camino has been shown to actually be faster than Safari. But I still expected better from Apple in regards to only releasing it for one OS

    Reply

Leave a Reply to Lucie Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Check Also

The Tiny Monorails That Once Carried James Bond / Tom Scott

The Roadmachines Mono-Rail may have been the only ...

Photos from Flickr