Politics, Rights, Technology

Leaked paper reveals Australia’s obsessive metadata secrecy

Last Friday, the Australian Attorney-General’s Department sent internet service providers (ISPs) a confidential discussion paper — subsequently leaked to Fairfax Media — that attempts to clarify exactly what metadata they’ll be required to store under the government’s proposed mandatory data-retention scheme. The detailed requirements are presumably designed to feed into the statutory specification of metadata that will be included in legislation to be introduced to parliament in coming weeks.

Until now, the only official government description of metadata we’d seen — apart from that breathtakingly confused TV performance by Australia’s favourite Attorney-General Senator George Brandis QC — was the hilariously inadequate one-pager (PDF) that the Attorney-General’s Department (AGD) tabled in Senate Estimates on October 15, 2012, after much prodding by Greens Senator Scott Ludlam.

You might therefore think that the description of the government’s metadata needs in Friday’s document was a recent development.

You’d be wrong.

A confidential document obtained by ZDNet shows that even more detailed descriptions of the government’s data-collection ambitions had been discussed with ISPs as far back as early 2010.

The document, Carrier-Carriage Service Provider Data Set Consultation Paper version 1.0 (PDF), is a 16-page PDF file created on 9 March 2010, at 14:49. Its core sections are similar in structure to the nine-page document obtained by Fairfax Media this week, with the addition of tables of sample data to further illustrate the expected type of data to be retained for each specific retention requirement from the data set, discussion questions for industry to answer, and an introductory background section rather than an executive summary.

The 2010 version of the document was quite specific about the data to be collected. For mobile calls, for example, the data would include the IMSI and IMEI of both the calling party’s and called party’s devices, whereas the current version simply specifies the identifier(s) of the devices. This is in line with the government’s intention to make the legislation technology neutral.

References to web-browser sessions and file transfers that were in the 2010 version have vanished, too, in line with such ideas being dropped as the data-retention debate has evolved — via redwolf.newsvine.com

Share this Story
  • Design

    White Oaks House / BARC Architects

    BARC Architects were asked by their clients, a professional couple with a love of architecture and interior design, to create a family ...
  • Wildlife

    Puma Kitten / Minnesota Zoo

    The Minnesota Zoo is excited to welcome a new male Puma kitten, named Landslide, to their Medtronic Minnesota Trail exhibit — via ZooBorns Related
  • Design

    Guerilla Tre / Rough Crafts

    Rough Crafts have built Guerilla Tre, a street scrambler based on the MV Agusta Dragster 800 RR — via Bike EXIF Related
  • Design

    Park House / tenfiftyfive

    Architecture studio tenfiftyfive have recently completed an addition to an old heritage house in Melbourne, Australia — via CONTEMPORIST Related
  • Design

    Fuel Catalina GP / Fuel Bespoke Motorcycles

    Karles Vives and his crew at Fuel Bespoke Motorcycles have based their latest project on a 1999 Kawasaki W650. This is the Fuel ...
  • Design

    Casa en la Pinada / Ramon Esteve

    Architect Ramon Esteve has recently completed this modern house that sits on the outskirts of Madrid, Spain, in an area full of woodlands ...
Load More Related Articles
Load More In Politics

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Photos from Flickr